Marking Rubric – Case Study Analysis

Marking Rubric – Case Study Analysis

07-12-17 Maddox Smith 0 comment

---

Marking Rubric – Case Study Analysis

Late assignment submission penalties

Penalties will be imposed on late assignment submissions in accordance with Kaplan Business School “late assignment submission penalties” policy.

Number of	Penalty
days
1* – 9 days	5% per day for each calendar day late deducted from the total marks
	available
10 – 14 days	50% deducted from the total marks available.
After 14 days	Assignments that are submitted more than 14 calendar days after the
	due date will not be accepted and the student will receive a mark of zero
	for the assignment(s).
Note	Notwithstanding the above penalty rules, assignments will also be given
	a mark of zero if they are submitted after assignments have been
	returned to students

*Assignments submitted at any stage within the first 24 hours after deadline will be considered to be one day late and therefore subject to the associated penalty

For more information please read the full policy 

COMMONWEALTH     OF      AUSTRALIA      Copyright

Regulations 1969

This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.

Assessment Information

BUS106 Assessment Marking Rubric – Case Study Analysis 40%

Criteria	HD (High Distinction)	DN (Distinction)	CR (Credit)	P (Pass)	NN (Fail)
	85%-100%	75%-84%	65%-74%	50%-64%	0%-49%
Analysis	Your analysis clearly and	Your analysis strongly	Your analysis satisfactorily	Your analysis partially identifies and	Your analysis does not
/40	thoroughly identifies and	identifies and applies relevant	identifies and applies relevant	applies some relevant BUS106	satisfactorily identify and apply
	applies relevant BUS106	BUS106 theories and concepts	BUS106 theories and concepts	theories and concepts	relevant BUS106 theories and
	theories and concepts				concepts
Suggestions	From your comprehensive	From your comprehensive	From your comprehensive	You have drawn some useful	Your market analysis lacked
/30	market analysis, you have	market analysis, you have	market analysis, you have drawn	suggestions although a more	depth. This has impacted on the
	drawn dynamic and	drawn convincing suggestions	mostly useful suggestions	comprehensive market analysis	quality of your suggestions
	convincing suggestions			would have been helpful
Report	Correct grammar and spelling	Correct grammar and spelling	Mostly correct grammar and	Mostly correct grammar and spelling	Spelling and/or grammar is
Format	throughout the analysis with	throughout the analysis, with	spelling used throughout, with	used throughout, with consistent	consistently incorrect, impacting
	no errors	the occasional minor error	occasional minor and/or major	minor and/or major errors	on the flow and readability of your
/30			error(s)		analysis
	Your analysis is			The format chosen for your analysis
	professionally presented and	Your analysis is professionally		is appropriate, but major	The format chosen for your
	have been submitted in an	presented and have been	The format chosen for your	improvements would enhance its	analysis lacks thought and
	entirely appropriate format	submitted in appropriate	analysis is appropriate but some	presentation	consideration for the intended
		format	improvements would enhance its		audience
	In-text referencing and the		presentation	Mostly correct in-text referencing
	resultant reference list are	In-text referencing and the		and a reference list with major errors	In-text referencing and/or
	correct, with no errors	resultant reference list are	Mostly correct in-text referencing		reference list is mostly incorrect
		correct, with only the	and a reference list with minor
		occasional minor error	errors and the occasional major
			error
Score
Out of 100
		Feedback and Grades will be released via Turnitin

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969

This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.

Marking Rubric – Case Study Analysis